Mandela and others claim that Apartheid was their real motivation - if that were true, then one needs to only examine Apartheid from 1948-1961 (a mere 13 years) - because that, supposedly, is the time period during which whites did terrible things which caused blacks to go over on to a war footing. But you will not find much violence happening in that period, because Apartheid was a pretty peaceful system. The so-called "Violence of Apartheid" is a mythology they dreamt up in which they take defensive actions by the White Govt of the day, and then misrepresent these as being offensive or repressive actions "which emanate from the violence of Apartheid". This is a complete mythology. Any govt, anywhere in the world, acts when there are riots, violence and murder, and the White Govt of the day reacted hardly any differently to any other Govt. What is constantly COVERED UP and IGNORED, is that the ANC or PAC were the SOURCE of the violence and that they were the ones attacking first. They were REVOLUTIONARY ORGANISATIONS hell bent on overthrowing the white Govt through force. Their statements on this are clear. All these things I am saying are there on the historical record. But now, there are many subtle twists added to this historical record to try to pretend that Apartheid was just a "violent system" and that these "peace-loving" people were somehow murdered for no good reason. This is ANC propaganda at its finest. This is complete nonsense. The Apartheid system against which the ANC rebelled, and which should be studied, to see what Apartheid was like at a time of peace, is the period 1948-1961. Anything after 1961 is the result of a White response to a black declaration of war made by Nelson Mandela himself.
Now, the blacks and liberals these days may want to try to fool themselves, but the Soweto uprisings, the attack on the Sharpeville Police station, etc were acts of war BY THEM! The kind of revolution that the ANC and PAC tried to stir up in South Africa (which they never achieved), was a type of French Revolution where the blood would flow in the streets. They tried to light a fire in the hope that it would burn out of control. Their greatest success was the 1976 uprising (uprising = Act of Revolution). And to this day, they milk the 1976 uprising for everything they can get out of it.
Now, the blacks and liberals these days may want to try to fool themselves, but the Soweto uprisings, the attack on the Sharpeville Police station, etc were acts of war BY THEM! The kind of revolution that the ANC and PAC tried to stir up in South Africa (which they never achieved), was a type of French Revolution where the blood would flow in the streets. They tried to light a fire in the hope that it would burn out of control. Their greatest success was the 1976 uprising (uprising = Act of Revolution). And to this day, they milk the 1976 uprising for everything they can get out of it.
The ANC, more than any other Liberation organisation rose to power on the dead bodies of children! The ANC, hypocrits that they are, like to pretend that they are the protectors of chidren. But in fact, their long history is one of exploiting children and using innocent black children as cannon-fodder. In *ALL* the Liberation struggles in Southern Africa, CHILDREN were involved. The ANC was making use of children as CHILD SOLDIERS (which these days is a hideous crime, and which still carries on in much of Africa). The ANC used children to take their bullets for them - and it was deliberate - make no mistake.
While the ANC did not actually abduct that many children here in S.Africa, they did instead use children to MURDER ADULTS and to intimidate them. They did this a lot. In the 1980's, here in SA there were blacks who said how small children ran around armed with handguns, threatening and attacking adults - and they did so at the behest of the ANC. It is a well documented fact that Winnie Mandela and her so-called "football club" had more sinister activities which included MURDER! It is also recorded that the ANC could hardly get adults to fight for it, so it used children as its cannon fodder, and the ANC more than anyone else, used and abused black children in their rise to power.
It was the ANC who had the slogan "Liberation before education".
So let us not kid ourselves about the 1976 Soweto uprisings. These things were not just spontaneous events as the ANC now likes to pretend. These were orchestrated acts intended to draw a response from the Govt of the day (which did react). And why? Well, these children were stoked up and were hell-bent on violence - and they were not just smashing things to bits, they were also killing people.
So let us not fall for the ANC's twisted and edited version of history that these "children" were all so cute and cuddly. This was an attempt - a failed attempt - by the ANC to start a nation-wide REVOLUTION so that blood would flow in the streets and the White Govt would be brought to a fall. This event it is dredged up continuously in ANC propaganda to this day.Here are photos that show you a couple of things about the 1976 Soweto riots which the ANC would love to keep under wraps forever in their attempts at rewriting history. (extracted from the book: "A History of Communism in South Africa").
And here we see the body of a white man, Dr Melville Edelstein, who went to help the blacks, and like the American girl, Amy Bhiel, he too was murdered for being white. The ANC goes on and on and on ad infinitum about the shooting of Hector Peterson - the first youth to be shot in those riots - but you never hear about Dr Edelstein do you? The arrow indicates a note the blacks leftnext to his corpse. It reads: "Beware".
And while we are on the subject of this MYTH of the "Apartheid massacres of peaceful blacks", here is another photo you will NEVER SEE. Remember the white claim that at Sharpeville, you had a small Police station and it was surrounded by armed blacks who were going to murder the Police inside? Well, here is a photo of the weapons collected by the Police after shooting 70 or so of these rioters who were hell-bent on MURDERING all the Police in that little building.
FW De Klerk himself, Nobel Peace prize winner that he is, has admitted publicly. De Klerk said that the blacks should be GRATEFUL that the whites handed over this country to their avowed ENEMIES! He said it was a big step on the part of the whites.
The blacks whine ad nauseum about a few hundred dead. They FORGET that the whites here were ARMED TO THEIR TEETH and could have killed them, not by the hundreds but by the hundreds of thousands - perhaps by the million. This country had nuclear weapons, and many tremendously advanced conventional weapons. If this had been a fight to the death, then black corpses would have littered every square foot of this country. That so few of them were killed attests to the tremendous RESTRAINT the Govt of this country had to never-ending provocation and acts of outright terrorism.
The negotiations which ended a 33 year war in this country were NOT based on an UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER at gunpoint. Even FW De Klerk did not "unconditionally surrender" to the blacks. This was a well-documented "negotiated settlement". You could call it a CEASE FIRE to use a better term. This was NOT about a total victory by black over white. This was an agreement to live in peace rather than to continue fighting to the bitter end. It was about mutually just burying the hatchet. As De Klerk himself said, the purpose was to prevent this country from ending up as a complete RUIN.
Hindsight being 20/20, a blind man can see that that was a futile gesture!
2 comments:
Fat lot of good that did - it's close to being a ruin.
We should have carried on the good fight - our country, our people - they deserved better. Look at it now, a disaster that is soon to be a twin to Zimbabwe.
Hello from the states , saw ya on SAS blog .
Like seeing those old photos , particularly those they don't want us too .
I agree with Michael , how different things might of been . Seems a curse amongst our people to be so blind as to the evil savages really mean for us . Where are all these liberal do gooders now ?
Looks like we're gonna have to deal with them none the less . May God be with and guide us . We're gonna have to stir the dust up a bit .
Post a Comment